you are lucky...malaysia petrol STILL lower than RM4 market price... we got subsidy for you...we are good and generous goverment...petrol is cheap...malaysian using cheap petrol...malaysia petrol is consider cheap already...cheap petrol...
Most people believe thats unchangable and accept the "truth"..but wake up!! do you really think its really cheap?
let me quote an article frm motherHau's blog :
讓我說個農場的故事﹐讓你知道什麼是國陣說的“津貼”……
在一個農場裡﹐每天可以生產 10粒蘋果。農場裡有 5個工人和 1個場主﹐總共 6個人。
他們每天一人吃一粒蘋果﹐就足夠維持農場裡的運作﹐所以還有剩下4粒蘋果。
場主把這4粒蘋果賣了﹐一粒 RM10。結果賺了 RM40。場主把這RM40拿來提昇農場裡的所有設施設備﹐
但是一天最多也需要 RM25罷了。多出的 RM10就拿來發給5個工人﹐每人有 RM2。
還有 RM5拿來當作自己的盈利。
日子這樣下去﹐這個農場就變得很先進而且工人的住宿和環境都是一流的。
5個工人也存了一筆錢。
但是不久這個好場主去世了﹐來了個新場主。新場主說﹕“我們要提昇農場素質﹐要有一流的思維。
現在你們吃的蘋果﹐需要給 RM1.00。但是你想想﹐這是很便宜的﹐你去外面買蘋果一粒要 RM10叻!”
工人沒辦法﹐就繼續做工和每天給 RM1.00 來吃他們以前每天吃的免費蘋果。
結果他們現在每天只得到 RM1.00。
現在﹐新場主還是把多餘的 4粒蘋果拿去賣﹐賺了 RM40﹐還是像從前一樣﹐RM25拿來提昇設施﹐
RM10就拿來發給5個工人﹐RM5拿來當作自己的盈利﹐再來﹐現在那5粒蘋果他賣給工人﹐賺了 RM5.00。
現在他共有每天RM10.00盈利。
不久﹐蘋果售價突然大漲了一倍﹐外面售價 RM20一粒。現在新場主還是把多餘的 4粒蘋果拿去賣﹐大賺了 RM80。
農場的設施提昇工程現在換了是新場主的朋友承包。新場主的朋友說﹐蘋果售價大漲﹐
設施提昇工程的費用也要漲價了﹐變成 RM50。其實真正費用才 RM30﹐
新場主把多出來的 RM20和他的朋友平分。
現在新場主有:
RM10 (和他的朋友平分的提昇工程費)
RM20 的盈利(RM80-RM50-RM10=RM20)
RM5 的賣蘋果給自己員工賺的錢。
總共是RM35.00。比起以前的RM7.50﹐新場主多賺了RM27.50!!
哇﹗﹗﹗暴利叻﹐蘋果售價突然大漲﹐農場賺多了 RM27。50。
但是工人還是每天只賺取RM1.00。
但是﹐貪心的新場主卻招來 5位員工﹐對他們說﹐“你們看看﹐
蘋果現在的市場售價是 RM20 一粒﹐但是你們卻用 RM1.00 來買一粒蘋果﹐你看你們多幸運!”
“我就辛苦了﹐我需要津貼你們每人 RM19.00﹐總共 RM95.00 來給你們蘋果吃啊﹐
你看農場的津貼負擔多麼的重!”
“農場真的很辛苦了﹐再這樣下去﹐農場會破產﹐倒閉。現在我賣你們每粒蘋果 RM1.50 吧﹐
我辛苦一點來津貼RM18.50。”
那麼現在新場主的暴利又增加了﹐RM20 + RM10 + RM7.50 = RM37.50。又賺多了RM2.50。
這 RM2.50 是從哪裡賺來的﹖就是從自己工人的口袋賺來的。
载自《在商言商》
quote from free media website:
人民公正党浮罗岸州立法议员黄锦河指出,世界原油价格攀高,造就了马来西亚国家燃油公司在2007年财政年获得马币464亿元盈利,比起2006财政年的431亿高出7.6%,而在2007年财政年,国油的国际业务营业额也从上一年的马币676亿元,增至966亿元。
“国家燃油资源应该是属于马来西亚全国人民的财产,国家燃油的盈利也应让全民所享有,身为燃油出产国的国民非但不能享受更廉宜的油价,还要负担更高昂的国内燃油价格,是不能让人民所认同的。”
it's never mind if u dont know chinese... here's another similar thing which I quote from part of the email :
Example:
Ahmad is a fisherman. He sells a fish to you at $10 which is below the market value of $15. Let's assume that he caught the fish from the abundance of the sea at little or no cost. Ahmad claims that since the market value of the fish is $15 and he sold you the fish for $10, he had subsidised you $5 and therefore made a loss of $5.
Question : Did Ahmad actually make a profit of $10 or loss of $5 which he claimed is the subsidy?
Answer:
Ahmad makes a profit of $10 which is the difference of the selling price ($10) minus the cost price ($0 since the fish was caught from the abundance of the sea). There is no subsidy as claimed by Ahmad.
ckyue's Q: Our country exports durian. UK import durian. why goverment not say the same thing to durian and increase the price too? why petrol? why not durian?y not kain batik? you know i know la....
It's ok if u say inflation...need higher cost to dig the petrol bla bla bla...but if u say such bullshit as what i know from media, it's unacceptable! what shit subsidy? is that belongs to yours? or US? i know natural resources will end 1 day.but is it really in this few year? or just an excuse to increase the price higher? you'll know when you have friend digging that resources.
5 comments:
来看文:)
我可以把这篇文章转贴在我部落和电邮发送吗?
謝謝;)
sure u can!
but thats not original email wor..the ahmad sell fish 1 actualy a very long email...u wan the original 1?
and... are u bao ying frm htts theatre?
野,你猜對了(拍掌~)
就是我。
抱歉忘了告訴你我是誰:)
我想看原文的,可以嗎?
謝謝:)
no..u did tell who r u...u got put ur name wat...hehe..
er...i dun hav ur email...how i send u the original email leh? mind to giv me ur msn too? hehe
my email and msn is same:)
yengv@hotmail.com
Post a Comment